The conflict in Mozambique’s northern province of Cabo Delgado is a multi-layered crisis, rooted in historical neglect and catalyzed by the discovery of vast natural resources. It has spiraled into a humanitarian and security disaster with significant regional and global implications, sustained, in part, by illicit economies and countered by a complex foreign military intervention.
Advertisement
1. The Catastrophic Economic and Fiscal Impact
The violence has had a devastating effect, shifting Mozambique’s financial focus from development to defense and severely undermining its most significant investment opportunity.
-
Fiscal Strain and Security Costs: The conflict has heavily strained Mozambique’s national budget. Between 2018 and 2022, the government’s additional national security expenditures—primarily for defense and public order—totaled an estimated 106.8 billion MZN (approximately $1.69 billion USD). This surge in military spending diverts resources from crucial social sectors.
-
Lost Gas Revenue: The cornerstone of Mozambique’s economic future, the $20 billion TotalEnergies Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) project at Afungi, has been suspended indefinitely following the 2021 Palma attack. The delay in this and other major gas projects results in an estimated loss of potential government revenue of 383.4 billion MZN (approximately $6.06 billion USD) under current market conditions.
-
Long-Term Development Loss: Beyond immediate costs, the conflict has reversed developmental gains in the impoverished province. The conflict-induced rise in illiteracy rates, which spiked by 8.7% between 2020 and 2022, is projected to cause a loss to Cabo Delgado’s regional GDP of up to 22.7 billion MZN (approximately $0.36 billion USD) over time due to a less productive workforce.
-
Destruction of Local Livelihoods: Thousands of people, especially coastal fishermen and rural farmers, have lost their primary means of income due to violence, displacement, and the initial land expropriation for the gas projects, further exacerbating poverty and driving recruitment.
2. The Complex Role of Foreign Forces
Mozambique’s government, initially relying on failed private military contractors, has increasingly depended on foreign military intervention to counter the insurgency.
-
The Initial Response (Private Military Companies):
-
Wagner Group (Russia): Deployed in late 2019, they were largely ineffective, suffering casualties due to a lack of local knowledge and inappropriate Soviet-era tactics against guerrilla warfare, leading to a quick withdrawal.
-
Dyck Advisory Group (South Africa): This company proved more effective tactically, utilizing helicopter gunships to halt insurgent advances but faced multiple accusations of human rights abuses and indiscriminate fire against civilians.
-
-
The Regional Intervention (Rwanda and SAMIM):
-
Rwanda Defence Force (RDF): Deployed in July 2021, the Rwandan contingent (initially 1,000 troops, now estimated around 5,000 as of mid-2024) has been the most decisive force. Working bilaterally with Mozambican forces, they swiftly recaptured key towns like Mocímboa da Praia and Palma, securing the area around the LNG project.
Advertisement
-
SADC Mission in Mozambique (SAMIM): The Southern African Development Community deployed its own mission concurrently. While achieving some success, SAMIM was often relegated to peripheral areas and suffered from inadequate resources and coordination issues. The mission formally withdrew in mid-2024.
-
-
Training and Support: The European Union Training Mission (EUTM) and the United States provide training and logistical support to the Mozambican armed forces to build long-term counter-terrorism capacity, recognizing that a military-only solution is insufficient.
-
The Dilemma: While foreign forces have curbed the insurgency’s advance and allowed for the return of some displaced persons, the reliance on external military solutions has deflected attention from the underlying political and socio-economic drivers of the conflict.
3. Heroin, Rubies, and the Insurgency’s Shadow Economy
The Cabo Delgado conflict is inseparable from a thriving transnational criminal economy, which provides both the permissive environment for the insurgency and potential sources of funding.
-
Heroin Trafficking (The “Smart Track”):
-
Northern Mozambique is a critical transit point on the “Smart Track,” a major route for Afghan heroin destined for Europe. Dhows transport the drug from the Makran Coast (Pakistan/Iran) to the long, porous coastlines of Cabo Delgado (particularly the port of Mocímboa da Praia before its capture).
-
This highly lucrative trade requires high-level political protection and corruption among security and government officials to allow massive shipments to transit unhindered, creating a corrupt state apparatus that fuels local resentment and feeds into the insurgent’s narrative of state betrayal.
-
The insurgency may profit by taxing illicit flows through areas they control or by receiving donations from businessmen entangled in the trade who seek stability or protection.
-
-
Ruby Smuggling:
-
The Montepuez ruby mine is one of the world’s largest ruby deposits. Local artisanal miners who were forcibly displaced or criminalized when a multinational took over the mine in 2012 formed part of the early pool of recruits for the insurgency.
-
The ruby trade, which is tied to politically connected elites within the ruling party, provides significant money-laundering opportunities. While systematic funding links between the insurgency and the official ruby company are unproven, rebel groups do loot and extort the illegal artisanal miners.
-
-
The Enabling Environment: Corruption within the Mozambican Security Forces is a massive enabler, with documented reports of elements selling weapons and ammunition to the insurgents and leaking operational plans for bribes. This widespread culture of impunity and illicit profit means some actors, within and outside the state, have a vested interest in the continuation of instability.
The conflict in Cabo Delgado serves as a potent example of a localized crisis—driven by decades of neglect and exacerbated by a resource curse—that has been strategically leveraged by a global terror network. A lasting solution requires moving beyond military operations to include governance reform, resource-sharing equity, and genuine transitional justice.