To the world, Nelson Mandela is a saint: the founding father of democratic South Africa, the man who defeated apartheid through peace and forgiveness. But in the townships, a different narrative lives on. Many saw Winnie Madikizela-Mandela—the woman who carried his name through 27 years of silence—as the true, uncompromising revolutionary, while accusing her former husband of being a “sellout” who gained his fame at her expense.
Advertisement
To understand this deep division, we must look beyond the simplified history and into the fire that was Winnie Mandela’s life.
The Mother of the Nation vs. The Prisoner
Winnie Nomzamo Winifred Zanyiwe Madikizela was born in 1936 in the rural Eastern Cape. Her name, Nomzamo, means “she who strives” or “undergoes trials,” a prophecy for a life defined by struggle. After training as the first black medical social worker at Baragwanath Hospital in Johannesburg, she witnessed the daily suffering of her people, sharpening her political consciousness long before she became “Mrs. Mandela.”
When she met Nelson Mandela in 1957, she was a professional, a force in her own right. They married in 1958, but their love story was immediately consumed by the struggle.
In 1964, Nelson Mandela was sentenced to life imprisonment on Robben Island. The government thought they had buried him in silence, but that silence became Winnie’s battleground.
- She became the public face of the struggle, defying police raids, banning orders (which made her a “non-person” who could not be quoted or speak to more than one person), and constant harassment.
- She endured 491 days in detention under the dreaded Terrorism Act of 1967, much of it in solitary confinement, where she spoke to cockroaches just to maintain her sanity.
- She was banished to the remote, dusty town of Brandfort in 1977. There, she defied exile by building a clinic and an early learning center, turning her cage into a center of resistance.
While Nelson was a mythic icon, preserved in the discipline of prison, Winnie was in the dirt, the chaos, and the fire of the streets. She transformed him from a prisoner into a legend by refusing to let South Africa forget his name.
The Turning Point: Fire and Necklaces
The Soweto Uprising of 1976 transformed the country, and Winnie was there, comforting grieving mothers and organizing funerals. By the 1980s, she was too dangerous to ignore, not as Mandela’s wife, but as a leader in her own right.
It was in this climate of radical violence that Winnie made the statement that would haunt her legacy:
“We have stones. We have boxes of matches. With our necklaces, we shall liberate this country.”
For her supporters, this captured the raw, uncompromising anger of the townships. For her critics, it appeared to endorse necklacing—a brutal form of execution using a burning tire—and crossed a moral line.
Advertisement
Her Orlando West home became a stronghold protected by the infamous Mandela United Football Club. Their actions, in a climate poisoned by informers, led to the tragedy that ultimately broke her marriage and stained her reputation: the 1988 kidnapping and murder of 14-year-old Stompie Seipei. Winnie was later convicted of kidnapping and assault (the latter overturned on appeal).
The Sellout Narrative: Peace vs. Justice
When Nelson Mandela walked free on February 11, 1990, it was Winnie’s hand he held. The image symbolized a victory of love and resilience.
However, the decades apart had created two very different people: one molded by the discipline of prison, the other by the chaos of the streets. The political cracks soon appeared, leading to their separation in 1992 and divorce in 1996.
But the “sellout” label came from her radical critique of the new ANC government. Winnie and her supporters argued that Nelson Mandela and the ANC leadership had compromised too much with the white establishment:
- Land: They failed to push for meaningful land redistribution; most arable land remains in white hands today.
- Economics: They preserved the economic power structure of the white minority.
- Truth and Reconciliation: The commission prioritized peace and amnesty over justice and reparations for the victims of apartheid crimes.
To Winnie, this was a betrayal of the poor black majority who had fought and died. Mandela was seen as the “angel” figure, created to appease white fears, while she remained the true, uncompromising revolutionary who still believed the fight was not over.
The Legacy: Who Was the Hero?
When Nelson Mandela died in 2013, Winnie’s name was notably absent from his will (she was an ex-wife), a final, painful public separation. Yet, at his memorial, the crowd spotted her and erupted in chants of “Winnie! Winnie! Winnie!”
When Winnie Madikizela-Mandela died in 2018, South Africa remembered her not as a flawless saint, but as Mama Winnie—the mother who had never left their side. She was loved and loathed, honored and condemned, but undeniably unforgettable.
The debate over Nelson and Winnie is ultimately a debate over the nature of liberation:
| Nelson Mandela
Path: Forgiveness, negotiation, and peace.
Result: A democratic state and global admiration.
Criticism: Compromised too much, preserved economic inequality.
| Winnie Madikizela-Mandela
Path: Resistance, confrontation, and fire.
Result: The revolutionary spirit and grassroots adoration.
Criticism: Endorsed violence, tied to human rights abuses (Stompie Seipei).
It is clear that without Winnie, who kept his name alive and stoked the fire of resistance in the townships, there would be no Nelson Mandela as the world remembers him. They represent the impossible choice faced by any revolution: the purity of the cause versus the pragmatic need for peace.
What Do You Think?
Did Nelson Mandela sell out the economic needs of his people for the sake of political peace? Was Winnie the true voice of the poor majority? Who, in this complex story, was the hero?