Seven months ago, the world’s most important oil chokepoint was operating normally, moving around 20 million barrels of oil a day without most people ever thinking about it. This week, ships are still being struck, insurance rates are still roughly 40 times normal, and the strait remains, in practical terms, closed. This isn’t a crisis that flared up and passed. It’s the longest disruption this waterway has ever seen, and it’s still unfolding. Here’s the full story of how we got here, and exactly where things stand as of mid-September 2026.
Advertisement
Chapter 1: How It Started — A Decapitation Strike, Not Just an Airstrike
On February 28, 2026, Israel and the United States launched a coordinated strike on Iran that went far beyond typical military targets. It killed Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, along with dozens of senior officials, including his top security adviser and the commander-in-chief of the Revolutionary Guard. It was, by design, a decapitation strike aimed at the top of Iran’s leadership structure all at once.
Iran’s response was immediate. Within days, tanker traffic through the strait collapsed as war-risk insurers pulled coverage on the route (a mechanism we covered in detail previously — insurance, not missiles, did most of the initial damage). On March 8, Iran named Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba Khamenei, as the country’s third Supreme Leader. He has remained almost entirely out of public view since taking the position, reportedly injured in the same strike that killed his father, and the United States has offered a $10 million reward for information on him.
Chapter 2: The Toll Booth, and Why Paying It Became Illegal
In March, Iran began requiring vessels to pay for “safe passage” through the strait — effectively a toll, enforced by the threat of mines and naval confrontation. This arrangement quickly attracted scam operators selling fraudulent transit documents for cryptocurrency, prompting Iran to formally establish the Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA) to centralize and legitimize the permit process.
Washington’s response made an already complicated situation worse for shipowners. On May 1, 2026, the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control issued an advisory stating that any payment to Iran for strait passage — cash, cryptocurrency, or otherwise — exposed both US and non-US persons to sanctions risk. In effect, shipping companies were caught between a hostile toll collector on one side and a legal minefield on the other, regardless of which one they tried to satisfy.
Chapter 3: A Peace Deal That Lasted Three Weeks
The most hopeful moment of this entire crisis came in June. After Islamabad-mediated talks in April had failed and the US Navy had begun its own blockade of Iranian ports in response, backchannel diplomacy eventually produced a breakthrough. On June 14, the US and Iran digitally signed a 14-point framework known as the Islamabad Memorandum, with Pakistan’s prime minister as guarantor. President Trump signed it in person at Versailles following the G7 summit; Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed it in Tehran on June 17.
The terms were specific: an end to military strikes, toll-free reopening of the strait to commercial shipping for 60 days, de-mining within 30 days, and at least 60 days of direct negotiations between the two countries. Iran’s new Supreme Leader endorsed it, reportedly “despite misgivings.”
It didn’t hold. On July 8, Iran struck multiple commercial ships in the strait, and the United States responded by striking Iranian territory. President Trump declared the memorandum “over.” One Tehran-based analyst later observed that the agreement had never been designed to resolve the underlying dispute in the first place — only to pause the fighting long enough to reopen shipping, without any real mechanism to address what the two sides were actually fighting about.
Chapter 4: Fighting Resumes, and Escalates
Since mid-July, the conflict has moved through repeated cycles of limited fighting and stalled negotiation. By late August and early September, it escalated sharply:
• August 30: US Central Command struck Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island.
• September 1: CENTCOM struck additional Iranian military targets; Iran retaliated with attacks on US-linked bases across Jordan, the UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Iraq simultaneously.
• September 5: A direct naval exchange of fire occurred between US and Iranian forces. According to multiple outlets, IRGC naval units fired ballistic missiles at American warships, and US forces struck three Iranian crude tankers in response — destroying one and permanently disabling two others.
• September 12: Iran reported an Iranian commercial vessel struck near Limah, Oman, killing one person, even as Iran-backed forces in Yemen simultaneously stepped up attacks on a second major regional waterway.
Advertisement
As of this week, Iran’s Foreign Ministry has said the strait will not return to normal until the United States honors its commitments under the now-collapsed Islamabad Memorandum. Oman has continued quiet negotiations with Iran on a longer-term governance arrangement for the waterway, resisting US pressure to cut off contact with Tehran entirely.
Chapter 5: The Numbers, Right Now
The scale of the disruption has only deepened over time. According to the US Energy Information Administration, oil flow through the strait averaged around 20.4 to 21.6 million barrels a day in the final quarter of 2025, before the war. That collapsed to about 14.6 million barrels a day in the first quarter of 2026, and to just 4.9 million barrels a day by the second quarter.
Traffic data tells the same story in a different way: as of early-to-mid September, daily transits were running around 6 vessels, against a pre-crisis baseline commonly cited between 85 and 138 ships a day, depending on the tracking source. War-risk insurance premiums for the route have been running at roughly 40 times peacetime rates. Brent crude has been trading in the high $90s to just over $100 a barrel — well above its pre-war level of around $65, though below the roughly $120 peak seen in the acute opening weeks of the crisis.
The human toll, while smaller than the economic one, is real: across the crisis to date, the conflict has caused 20 seafarer deaths, 1 port worker death, 35 injuries, and 1 person still missing. Among the world’s largest container shipping companies, 4 of the top 9 carriers have confirmed they’ve stopped using the strait entirely, with dozens of vessels still stranded inside the Gulf.
Chapter 6: The Workarounds Are Slowly Becoming Real
One meaningful shift since the crisis began: countries with alternatives are actually starting to use them at scale. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have been actively rerouting crude through pipelines that bypass the strait entirely — Saudi Arabia’s East-West Pipeline (Petroline) and the UAE’s pipeline to Fujairah. As covered previously, these routes were never designed to replace anywhere near the full 20 million barrels a day that normally transits Hormuz, but they represent real barrels no longer waiting on a resolution to reach the market.
Chapter 7: What “Reopening” Actually Requires Now
Perhaps the most sobering lesson from the past seven months is how disconnected diplomatic progress has become from actual shipping activity. Even during the brief window when the Islamabad Memorandum was in effect, commercial shipping didn’t simply resume overnight — mine-clearing takes time, and insurers don’t restore coverage on a diplomat’s promise; they wait for a sustained track record of safety. That lag has repeated itself with each ceasefire attempt: a political agreement gets signed, and shipping companies wait, watching to see whether it survives contact with the next incident before they risk a ship and a crew on it.
Right now, forecasters tracking the crisis are framing recovery in terms of specific traffic thresholds — for instance, whether the seven-day moving average of transits climbs back above 60 ships a day before the end of the year, or takes until well into 2027. Nobody currently tracking this crisis is treating a quick return to normal as the likely outcome.
Why This Matters for Namibia
This ongoing crisis is now the longest and largest disruption in the Strait of Hormuz’s history — and it’s still being written in real time. For Namibia, the lesson isn’t abstract: crude oil is priced on global benchmarks that this conflict has kept elevated and volatile for seven months and counting, meaning the eventual price Namibia receives for its own offshore oil will carry the fingerprints of a war fought thousands of kilometers away, over a stretch of water Namibia has no stake in and no influence over. It’s a live, ongoing reminder of exactly the kind of external risk that good local content policy, diversified partnerships, and financial discipline are meant to help a resource economy absorb — because the world Namibia’s oil is about to enter doesn’t pause its instability to wait for anyone.